|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Business
| Previous
| Next
State Govt. directed to issue licence to DSQ Beverages
By Our Special Correspondent
CHENNAI, APRIL 7. The uncertainty over the extra neutral alcohol
(ENA) plant of DSQ Beverages is set to end with the Madras High
Court directing the State Government to clear the decks for its
operation by issuing requisite licence within six weeks.
Mr. Justice E. Padmanabhan, in his order dated March 30, had also
asked the State Government not to ``grant licence or privilege or
permission to increase the capacity of the existing units as
ordered in G.O. 50 Ms. No. 50, Prohibition and Excise, dated
February 11, 2000'' until DSQ Beverages is given the licence.
Company officials have indicated that DSQ Beverages would
commence production of ENA once the licence is obtained following
the court order.
The State Government, it may be recalled, had rejected the
company's application for the manufacture of ENA, a basic
feedstock for producing bottled alcoholic beverage, from grain.
It had rejected the application on the ground that there was
already excess supply of product.
Originally, the letter of intent (LoI) for the project was issued
to the Tamil Nadu Industrial Development Corporation (Tidco) in
1991. Subsequently, the State Government had called for joint
venture partner to put up the unit and signed an agreement with
the DSQ group in 1993. In technology tie-up with JP International
OY, Finland, the plant was set up with an investment of Rs. 80
crores. Production could not commence as the Government had
rejected the application. What had surprised DSQ Beverages was
the fact that the Government had chosen to allow existing
bottlers to raise capacity after rejecting its own application.
The argument that the application was rejected as the policy did
not encourage more units did not find favour with the Judge.
``Only at the final stage of rejection such a reason had been
invented and set out in the order,'' he said.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Business Previous : 'Juice business in India is complicated' Next : Stock scam: Loopholes in trading mechanism | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|