|
Online edition of India's National Newspaper Sunday, April 08, 2001 |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home |
|
Opinion
| Previous
| Next
Where bad politics bowls a googly
Can politics and sport be really separated, what with nearly
every sports foundation in the country being controlled by some
politician, asks VIJAY LOKAPALLY.
JAVED MIANDAD, the man who so bitterly supports the idea of
Pakistan boycotting India on all cricket fields of the world now,
had, five years ago, a very different view of the relations
between the two neighbouring countries. He spoke of his dream, a
combined India-Pakistan team which could whip any combination in
the world. It shall remain a dream.
`Thanks' to the politicians on either side of the border, we will
not witness any more fascinating duels between Sachin Tendulkar
and Wasim Akram or Harbhajan Singh and Yousuf Youhana. Such is
the implication of India deciding to pull out of the three-nation
tournament scheduled at Sharjah.
By denying the cricket team permission to visit Pakistan last
year for a Test series and now travel to Sharjah, the Government
has created a situation where the Board of Control for Cricket in
India (BCCI) will find it difficult when trying to convince the
rest of the fraternity. In a group of ten Test-playing countries,
if two teams repeatedly refuse to play each other the message
that reaches out to the public can hardly be termed constructive.
Well, there will be one particular section quite happy with this
latest development - the Indian expatriates in the Gulf. They get
a welcome reprieve from the humiliation of watching their team
suffer repeatedly at the hands of Pakistan at Sharjah.
Often it is said that sports should not be mixed with politics, a
most worn-out cliche in the Indian system. But can they be really
separated, what with nearly every sports federation in the
country being controlled by some politician? It is indeed a sorry
state of affairs that people with little sports background sit in
judgment to decide the fate of sports in India.
The Government has hardly earned any marks by preventing the team
from travelling to Sharjah. It has not even cared to clarify its
stance and the reasons behind this attitude of not wanting to
play a bilateral cricket competition with Pakistan. If the
Government wants to protect the cricketers from being influenced
by the underworld mafia, as is being projected following the
recommendations of the CBI, the move might earn support. But what
if the reason is just wanting to avoid meeting Pakistan for
political gains and nothing more. If that be the case, it is
quite perplexing how the Government grants permission to Indian
teams to play Pakistan in other disciplines.In Dhaka again, the
Indian under-17 team had won the Asia Cup recently, with a
victory against Pakistan in the semifinal in an atmosphere which
may not be hostile but certainly not friendly. An India-Pakistan
clash in Dhaka would be no different than playing in Karachi or
Lahore.
It is not the first time India will be pulling out of Sharjah
after prior commitments. After 1991, India had stayed away from
the desert venue for three years not because of the fear of the
underworld but because some of Board officials, including the
then BCCI president, Mr. Madhavrao Scindia, had been ill-treated
by the same man who came to Delhi frantically to win the heart of
the Indian Government.
Strangely, the Government has had different yardsticks to view
India-Pakistan relations. Exchanges between students are
encouraged, as are the visits by elite citizens from either side
- intellectuals, musicians, and cultural ambassadors. But mention
cricket and the Government becomes paranoid.
Not visiting Pakistan in the aftermath of Kargil was a move
supported unanimously. With soldiers dying on the border, it
would have been cruel for the cricketers to test their skills in
Pakistan. The same teams, a little later, met in Australia and
Dhaka. How were those assignments different since the opponent
remained the same?
Without undermining the contributions of those who lost their
lives defending the borders of the country, one cannot fathom the
wisdom of the Government refusing permission to play in Sharjah.
It smacks of hypocrisy because in the same breath it talks of
improving relations with that country by allowing exchanges on
the other fronts.
If Sharjah is dangerous, Dhaka and Colombo cannot be much
different. At this rate the Indians will gradually find
themselves isolated within Asia itself.It is a shame if the
Indian cricketers continue to avoid playing Pakistan in Pakistan,
at home or at a neutral venue. The problem is not Sharjah or
Singapore or Toronto. The problem is Pakistan. In that case, let
there be no sporting ties at all with Pakistan until the time
politicians deem it fit. It is their game, and nothing else, that
matters.
Send this article to Friends by E-Mail
|
|
Section : Opinion Previous : Driven into a corner Next : Playing the spoilsport | |
|
Front Page |
National |
Southern States |
Other States |
International |
Opinion |
Business |
Sport |
Entertainment |
Miscellaneous |
Features |
Classifieds |
Employment |
Index |
Home | |
|
Copyrights © 2001 The Hindu Republication or redissemination of the contents of this screen are expressly prohibited without the written consent of The Hindu |
|